Discussion of teacher readiness CGPT

 

Low teacher confidence and lack of subject knowledge

Research consistently shows that confidence and subject knowledge strongly influence teachers’ implementation of new curriculum content. In related fields (e.g., computing), low teacher self-efficacy correlates with poor uptake of digital topics (Mannila et al., 2018; Vivian & Falkner, 2019)pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Teachers who lack experience in digital accessibility—such as WCAG or Universal Design for Learning (UDL)—are unlikely to introduce it without first rebuilding their own understanding (Fisseler, 2024)arxiv.org. Thus, while teachers may recognise the value of digital accessibility, their limited knowledge and confidence pose a significant barrier. 

2. Requirement for substantial training vs. time constraints

Digital accessibility involves both technical standards (e.g., WCAG) and pedagogical strategies (e.g., UDL), neither of which are currently mandated in teacher training. Studies highlight that one-off, short sessions can raise awareness, but deeper implementation requires ongoing professional development (Spooner et al., 2007). However, teachers express anxiety over the time required: they value accessibility training, yet worry about its impact on an already overburdened schedule. This creates a tension between need and feasibility unless training is embedded effectively within existing structures.

3. Lack of anchor experiences for classroom application

Teachers without firsthand experience learning or teaching digital accessibility lack the practical reference points needed to plan effective lessons. This chasm between theory and practice was evident in a recent UK-based teacher training package, developed to scaffold accessibility knowledge through empirical, step-by-step checklists and implementation aids that address the practical obstacles teachers perceive in everyday teaching scenarios (Schmidt & colleagues, 2023)link.springer.com. Without such a scaffolded approach, teachers may struggle to bridge abstract concepts and real classroom activities.

4. Insufficient hardware and software infrastructure

Digital inclusion depends heavily on access to up-to-date devices and accessibility software (e.g., screen readers, captioning tools). Critiques in higher and further education emphasise that instructors often lack these resources and technical support, impeding full integration of WCAG into teaching materials (Lomellini, 2024). In a primary school context, the absence of appropriate devices or software will likely prevent teachers from modelling inclusive practice, reinforcing their uncertainty.

5. Unawareness of foundational guidelines and inclusive design frameworks

Many teachers remain unaware of critically important constructs such as web regulations, WCAG, the social model of disability, or UDL. For example, while STEM disciplines enjoy better primary-level coverage, digital accessibility remains under-addressed (Fisseler, 2024)arxiv.org. Without grounding in such frameworks, instruction is likely to be superficial or inconsistent.

6. Absence from national curriculum and scarcity of pedagogical resources

As digital accessibility is not explicitly mandated in the current national curriculum, teachers have little directive or incentive to integrate it. Research in computing education demonstrates that educators often perceive accessibility training as optional or peripheral, resulting in its omission unless mandated (Parthasarathy & Joshi, 2023)amnet.com+15arxiv.org+15pressbooks.pub+15. Moreover, studies emphasize a lack of tailored pedagogical materials: accessing accessible Word or PowerPoint checklists for university lecturers is one thing, but comparable K–12 resources are virtually absent (Schmidt et al., 2023)link.springer.com+1digitalaccessibility.leeds.ac.uk+1.

📌 Implications for Upper Key Stage 2

Based on the above, the following implications emerge:

  1. Teachers will require structured, ongoing professional development, integrating both conceptual knowledge (e.g., WCAG, social models) and applied pedagogies (UDL, accessible document creation).

  2. Training must be embedded and low-threshold, given time constraints: modular formats, integrated within school INSET days or existing CPD structures, would likely increase adoption.

  3. Practical scaffolding is essential: classroom examples, device and software access, and anchor experiences must be provided, allowing teachers to see how accessibility applies at Key Stage 2 cognitive and digital levels.

  4. Curriculum mandates and resource development: to ensure sustainability, digital accessibility must be recognized within curriculum frameworks or school priorities—and matched with lesson plans, software tools, and assessments.

  5. Addressing infrastructure needs: schools must audit their hardware and software to support inclusive practice—access to devices with assistive features should be standard.

Suggested strategic responses

  • Cascade professional development: adopt an adapted cascade or trainer-of-trainers model so that expert-led, context-specific support reaches every KS2 teacher (El-Hamamsy et al., 2023)arxiv.org.

  • Leverage UDL frameworks (Rose & Meyer, 2002): training on UDL implementation can bolster confidence in designing multimodal, accessible lessons without requiring specialist software (Spooner et al., 2007; Woods, 2022).

  • Use experiential learning modules: similar to university ‘Learning Labs’, classroom pilots could be developed using hands-on accessible material design, embedding both empathy-building and technical evaluation (Shi et al., 2020)arxiv.org.

🧩 Conclusion

The data suggests that in the current situation, without strategic and systemic support, teachers in upper Key Stage 2 will struggle to deliver effective digital accessibility awareness. Addressing this challenge requires a multipronged approach: building teacher knowledge and confidence; embedding training into school systems; providing scaffolded experiences; aligning curriculum and pedagogy; and ensuring infrastructure readiness. Only then can digital accessibility become a realistic, embedded part of primary education.

📚 Select References (APA)

  • El-Hamamsy, L., Monnier, E.-C., et al. (2023). An Adapted Cascade Model to Scale Primary School Digital Education Curricular Reforms arxiv.org

  • Fisseler, B. (2024). Digital Accessibility Literacy: A Conceptual Framework arxiv.org+1pressbooks.pub+1

  • Lomellini, A. (2024). Digital Accessibility: empowering learners to succeed edtechinnovationhub.com

  • Schmidt, et al. (2023). Sensitize and Qualify University Teachers for Digital Accessibility link.springer.com

  • Shi, W., Malachowsky, S., et al. (2020). Experiential Learning in Computing Accessibility Education arxiv.org

  • Spooner, F., Baker, J. N., Harris, A. A., & Browder, D. M. (2007). Teacher confidence to implement UDL


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Notes from original proposal

Text taken from original proposal to unpack/expand: The barriers and ‘unlearning’ highlighted during SCULPT were potentially framed by prior complex  beliefs and understandings and ‘unlearning’ or ‘retrofitting’ skills (Youngblood, 2010). As Gu (2010, p.340) explains “a large part of human and professional knowledge can hardly retain its original meaning when it is divorced from the contexts in which it was constructed and produced.” This made me consider that these skills should potentially be taught at the point these original meanings are constructed and that happens at a much younger age. To understand when it would be appropriate to introduce the basics of awareness and skills in school, I considered the age when young people develop digital skills (Department for Education, 2013) as well as an understanding of what it means to be disabled and children’s perceptions for those with disabilities (Boer et al, 2012).  In a literature review Babik & Gardner (2021) found th...
Read more

Teach Access Repository and Facebook research link

Image
 #Educators, do your students know what assistive technology means? From tactile maps to screen readers, #AssistiveTechnology includes a number of devices that enable and foster the inclusion of people with disabilities. The Teach Access Curriculum Repository (TACR) has various resources designed to build out your courses and introduce your students to these types of technologies.  Go to the TACR (https://lnkd.in/gWMxzk2e) and check out the presentation slide deck on assistive technology and the assignment for using a screen reader, under the Psychology section.    #BackToSchool #Accessibility #Inclusion #ScreenReader #AssistiveDevices #Psychology #Disability #Disabilities #A11y https://teachaccess.org/curriculum-repository/ Facebook research post: PhD Thesis Writing Process: A Systematic Approach—How to Write Your Introduction To download complete article, use the link: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590321.pdf https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590321.pdf?f...
Read more

Ideas for initial quantitative survey data

Phase 1 will be an initial survey to paint a basic picture of knowledge in schools. This survey I aim to do with a large number of respondents to get a broad picture of a range of schools and scale to have more reliable data to be able to group and analyse. This will be followed up with semi structured interviews to add more detail and to explain and better understand the findings. This will be smaller in scale but across a cross section of participants from a range of settings. *This in terms of Dewey is going to help identify the extent of the problem and help reflect on the problem. Any findings can also be located in literature to triangulate and discuss. Phase 2 will be focus groups exploring a range of knowledge concepts and resources (suggested solutions) with both teachers and learners to identify their level of understanding of each of them is and what could be realistically embedded into the curriculum and at what point or made visible and understood in the education space to...
Read more